Writings of David Amos   David Amos    List of honorees         Louis Rose Society      Jewishsightseeing home    SD Jewish Times

Music Notes: What About All Those “Wrong Notes?”

By David Amos  
San Diego Jewish Times, January 1, 2006

This is a somewhat negative article, not about the wrong notes we hear, but about the lack of them, and the notes we do not hear.

Nowadays, we hear virtual perfection from soloists and orchestras. That is what we expect. Sometimes it’s as we are hearing a computer, flawless, no spontaneity, no risks, just safe notes. So many artists on the concert stage will not take any chances, but it is at the sacrifice of creativity.

It was different in the past. Here are a few salient examples.

Among the most exciting recordings of a live performance is the one of pianist Sviatoslav Richter playing Moussorgsky’s Pictures at an Exhibition in Sofia, Bulgaria sometime in the 1950s. The dated Columbia LP record is full of flaws. The microphone placement is questionable, and the audience has a collective case of terminal coughing. And Richter misses more notes than you could imagine.

Yet, this is an electrifying performance. The energy level coming out of the piano is indescribable, as is the virtuosity of the soloist. The communication is so strong, the message of the music so vivid, that after a while you forget about the pianistic clinkers, and you feel transported to a different dimension.

If you want to hear sloppy ensemble playing, listen to many of the recordings of Wilhelm Furtwangler and the Berlin Philharmonic, in releases from the 1930s and ’40s. But that becomes unimportant. What you keep and remember from these historical discs is music that sparkles, is alive and energetic. Furtwangler’s interpretations were legendary, and once you go past the poor recording sound and the less-than-perfect playing, the real quality becomes apparent.

Here is another classic example. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: “Artur Schnabel (1882-1951), was a classical pianist who also composed and taught. He was renowned for his seriousness as a musician, avoiding anything resembling pure technical bravura. He was said to have tended to disregard his own technical limitations in pursuit of his own musical ideals. However, Schnabel is widely considered one of the greatest pianists of the 20th century, whose vitality, profundity, and spiritual penetration in his playing of works by Beethoven and Schubert in particular, have seldom, if ever been surpassed.”

Today, we judge a performance and call it “faulty” if it has a few wrong notes. But quite the opposite, if we do that, we are listening to the wrong things, and missing the whole point of what music is all about.

There are many wonderful and talented soloists in the world today. But in the past, you could recognize the style of an emerging soloist by the teacher with whom he or she studied. The individual personality was all there, but the stamp of the master teacher or the school was clearly discernible. It had a pedigree. Today, no matter where or with whom a young artist studied, they all tend to sound alike, with a non-geographic, predictable similarity to other emerging talent.

It is no secret that musical competitions of the last 25 years or so are usually won by the contestants who play the loudest and the fastest. None of the subtleties and spontaneous imagination that make great music is to be found. And judges, artists’ managers, booking agents and audiences on the whole, don’t get it.

The best music being made today on a worldwide, world-class level is by musicians who are willing to take chances. They play and create something vibrant and fresh during the performance, not just “play it safe.”

No wonder recitals and concerts, on the whole, are stale experiences that do not communicate and leave so many listeners dissatisfied, sometimes not even knowing why. And maybe this is a contributing factor to the ever-growing problem of creating new, young audiences.

Many of us who are veteran concertgoers have become somewhat immune to the cookie-cutter interpretations on stage today, and hear not what is on stage, but what we want to hear. Younger, less seasoned listeners may actually be more perceptive than many of us, and are somewhat unexcited by the concert experience.

I have discussed this subject through the years with many people, in and out of music, and more recently, with someone who has had a direct connection with some of the greatest names in music of the 20th century, including legendary artists.

By learning from the past, music can strengthen its present and future.