San Diego Jewish World
                         'There's a Jewish story everywhere'
                                               

 

 Vol. 1, No. 130

        Friday Afternoon, September 7, 2007
 
Community Phone & Email Directory
Jewish World Community Calendar

AJE Makor Calendar

UJF Community Calendar
 
Search This Site
  (click here)
Jewish Forum questions: join the discussion;
          
click here
Jewish Grapevine files
Back issues by date
Back-issue headlines
PLEASE SUPPORT OUR ADVERTISERS; THEY ARE HELPING TO BRING San Diego Jewish World TO YOU:
Agency for Jewish Education
America's Vacation Center 
●Bubbla Packaging
Chabad at University CityCongregation Beth Israel
Elijah's
Humanistic Jewish Congregation
I'm There For You Baby radio show  
In the Know radio show
Israel Guide Dog Center
JCC Maccabi games  
Jewish American Chamber of Commerce 
Jewish Community Foundation
●Jewish Family Service
Museum of Man:
Journey to the copper age
Ohr Shalom Synagogue 
Old Town Trolley Tours of San Diego
San Diego Community Colleges
San Diego Jewish Academy
Seacrest Village Retirement Communities
Tifereth Israel Synagogue
Columnists/
   Writers

*David Amos
*Laurie Baron
*Judy Lash Balint
*Shoshana Bryen
*Cynthia Citron
*Carol Davis
*Rabbi Wayne Dosick
*Garry Fabian
*Gail Forman
*Sandy Golden
*Gerry Greber
.
*Norman & Roberta Greene
*
Alex Grobman,PhD
*
Donald H. Harrison
*
Irvin Jacobs, MD
*
Natasha Josefowitz
*
Bruce Kesler
*Judith Apter Klinghoffer
*
Rabbi Baruch Lederman
*
Dov Burt Levy
*
Elizabeth Levy
*
Ya'acov Liberman
*
Bruce Lowitt
*
Joel Moskowitz, MD
*Joe Naiman
*
Sheila Orysiek

*Yoni Peres
*Fred Reiss
*Michael Rosen
*Rabbi Leonard Rosenthal
*Dan Schaffer
*Ira Sharkansky
*Dorothea Shefer-Vanson
*David Strom
*Lynne Thrope
*Eileen Wingard
*Isaac Yetiv
*Edward Zeiden
*Heather Zeiden

 
Contact us
Email: sdheritage@cox.net
PO Box 19363
San Diego, CA 92159
(619) 265-0808

San Diego Jewish World is a publication of The Harrison Enterprises of San Diego, co-owned by Donald & Nancy Harrison.
 


 


San Diego Jewish World by email

Would you like to receive an e-mail each evening with an interactive list of our stories similar to the one below?
 
 Simply e-mail your request to us at
sdheritage@cox.net with the word "subscribe" in the subject line of your message form. 
 
 This service, updating you on Jewish news from around the world, is free, and you may unsubscribe at any time!

 


(Please click on headline below to jump to the story)

Israel and Middle East

$2.4 billion for Israel included in Senate version of Foreign Operations bill

If Iran has 3,000 centrifuges up and running, you can start the countdown

Dov Burt Levy: The unheeded words of peace

Europe

Shirley Cloyes DioGuardi: Albania and the Holocaust: Jewish Survival &  the Ethics of ‘Besa’
 

United States of America

NJDC demands Democrat Moran retract his 'Israel lobby' comment

Saperstein welcomes court decision narrowing impact of Patriot Act

Judaism

Rabbi Leonard Rosenthal: We still refer to Moses in the present tense: Moishe Rabeinu

Rabbi Baruch Lederman: The priest returns a favor

Features

 Jewish Grapevine
 

Shabbat Shalom!

$2.4 billion for Israel included in Senate version of Foreign Operations bill

              -SDJW Staff Report-

WASHINGTON, DC  —The American Israel Public Affairs Commitee (AIPAC) and various members of the Senate found much to praise in the Senate's version of the $34 billion Foreign Operations Appropriations bill approved Thursday night.

To begin with, there was $2.4 billion in military aid to Israel.  In a news release, AIPAC said this amount "represents the last year of a 10-year-plan between Israel and the United States to phase out economic aid to Israel while gradually increasing the amount of military aid.

"Composing about one percent of the federal budget, the amount of foreign aid spending is a cost-effective way to demonstrate U.S. leadership and protect American interests around the globe."

The bill also included several provisions by Sen. Frank Lautenberg (Democrat, New Jersey) which he listed as follows:

● "Middle East Peace: restoring $5 million in funding for the Middle East Regional Cooperation Program, a vital program facilitating people-to-people interaction between Israelis and Arabs in the scientific community.  The Bush Administration chose to zero out funding for MERC in its FY 2008 State Budget request, despite its 25 years of success," Lautenberg said.

● "Libya: blocking $110 million in funding for the construction of a U.S. embassy in the Libyan city of Tripoli because of the Libyan government's failure to fully resolve outstanding claims to the families of victims of terrorism from the 1988 Pan Am Flight 103 bombing over Lockerbie, Scotland and 1985 LaBelle Discotheque bombing in Berlin, Germany," the New Jersey Democrat added.

Refugees: extending the Lautenberg Amendment," which has granted over 400,000 people, who are proven victims of religious persecution in the former Soviet Union, Vietnam and Laos, refugee status in the United States," Lautenberg said.

Senators Joe Lieberman (Independent, Connecticut) and Norman Coleman (Republican, Minnesota) were part of a group of senators who were able to restore $50 million for aid to dissident and democratic groups inside Iran.  The administration had cut a $75 million budget to $25 million for this purpose.

"At a time when the Iranian regime is doing everything in its power to roll back dissidents and democrats, Congress has sent a powerful signal that we stand with the Iranian people in their struggle for freedom," Lieberman said.  "There is an inextricable link between the domestic repression of the Iranian regime and its aggression abroad.  Supporting Iranian dissidents is not only a moral imperative; it is a strategic necessity."

All 13 Jewish senators—nine Democrats, two Republicans and two Independents—voted in favor of the bill, which now goes to a Senate-House conference committee.

The measure had won 241-178 passage in the House in June after the Republican caucus decided to vote against it, partially in protest of a provision within the omnibus bill that would have permitted the United States to disseminate contraceptives to non-governmental organizations overseas.

Recalling that vote, the National Jewish Democratic Council issued a news release to "reverse course, drop their opposition to the bill, and stand with their Senate counterparts."

"Senate Democrats and Republicans alike should be applauded for their support of the Foreign Aid Appropriations Bill, and friends of Israel should be encouraged that Foreign Aid continues to enjoy bipartisan support in the U.S. Senate," said NJDC Executive Director Ira N. Forman. "Here's hoping that the House Republican leaders are swayed by public pressure and reconsider their opposition to Foreign Aid."

However, the Senate version includes what amendment co- authors Senators Barbara Boxer (Democrat, California) and Olympia Snowe (Republican, Maine) describe as the repeal of the "Global Gag Rule," precluding official U.S. involvement in the dissemination of birth control information.

“The repeal of the Global Gag Rule policy is long overdue,” Boxer said.  “Thousands of women have died because of this dangerous policy, and I will work as hard as I can to see that it is finally overturned.”

The Boxer-Snowe Amendment repeals the Global Gag Rule, which President Bush established by executive order on his first working day in office in 2001.  Also known as the Mexico City Policy, the Global Gag Rule denies U.S. international family planning assistance to foreign non-governmental organizations that use their own funds to counsel women on the availability of abortion, advocate for changes to abortion laws, or provide legal abortion services.


The preceding story incorporates information provided by AIPAC, NJDC, and the offices of Senators Boxer, Lautenberg and Lieberman

 



 

Israel and Middle East

If Iran has 3,000 centrifuges up and running, you can start the countdown
 


By Shoshana Bryen


"You are being cooperative," said the IAEA.

"No, we're not," replied Iran.

"Yes, you ARE being cooperative," insisted the IAEA. "ElBaradei told The New York Times that you are intentionally slowing progress on your centrifuges to be conciliatory. He had a 'gut feeling' that you were doing it for political reasons."

"No, no, no! We are definitely NOT being cooperative," shouted Iran, stamping its metaphorical foot. "We've got 3,000 centrifuges up and running."

The argument between the IAEA and Iran would be comical if it wasn't for the fact that if 3,000 centrifuges spin continuously for a year, they can produce enough enriched uranium for a nuclear weapon. If Iran has them running now, start the countdown.

One of them is wrong; which one is unclear. But the situation begs the question why, at the moment even France is becoming adamant about not accepting a nuclear Iran, would Ahmadinejad vehemently contradict IAEA Director General Mohamad ElBaradei, who is trying to protect his program? The answer may lie in the internal politics of Iran - much as Saddam's insistence that he was ready to "burn half of Israel" with chemical weapons had to do with something other than the truth. He used the threat of external enemies to maintain control of his fractious realm and had a not-uncommon need to appear more powerful than he was to frighten off internal and external enemies.

Ahmadinejad also despotically rules an unhappy people, has delusions about his place in the universe and may, like Saddam, underestimate American patience. Saddam never left the Middle East and killed advisors who brought him bad news, so his worldview was skewed.

Ahmadinejad is also not worldly in the way one would hope the leader of a historically rich country of 67 million would be. There are reports that Ahmadinejad has overplayed his hand in Tehran. His longtime rival, former president Ali Akbar Rafsanjani, is the newly elected speaker of the Experts Assembly, the body that elects and can remove Supreme Leaders of Iran.

Rafsanjani has been an advocate of speaking more softly and making certain accommodations with the West that increase Iran's economic and political maneuverability. Opposite to the approach of Ahmadinejad, though they vary little in goals.

Gasoline rationing has begun and the Iranian economy is in dreadful straits even without increased Western economic sanctions. Inflation and unemployment are high, and the religious police just closed 20 barbershops in Tehran for giving "inappropriate" haircuts. People are being arrested daily for what they say, do and write.

Ahmadinejad may be trying to rally the people around the idea that that he can bring Iran to glory with nuclear power/weapons. He may be lying to goad the West into threatening him for his own ends. Or, he may be presiding over a cascade of 3,000 centrifuges.

Bryen is director of special projects for the Jewish Institute for National Security   Affairs

 
Dov Burt Levy          
 
The unheeded words of peace

SALEM, Massachusetts (Press Release)—The media have been filled with remembrances of the death of Princess Diana ten years ago. But not remembered, except for their families andfriends, are the five people, four high school girls among them, killed in Jerusalem by a suicide bomber on September 4, 1997, just four days after Diana's death.

Beside my own apprehension about having been on the spot of the downtown Jerusalem bombing just 90 minutes before it occurred andhaving great sorrow for those killed and injured, my thoughts moved tomy grandchildren, Michael and Jenny, then 10 and 8 years old, who soon
enough would be the same age as the dead children.

When the editor of an American grandparent publication, for whom I had written, phoned a few days after the bombing to check on how my family was doing, I agreed to her suggestion to write something about the situation from a grandparent's perspective.

Here is how I linked grandparenting and the death of Princess Diana.

When my grandchildren were born in Jerusalem, I was the happiest grandfather in the world.

I always was a peacenik, but with each hug of these kids, I prayed that at least, by the time they were 18 years old, their military service would be a peacetime assignment.

I wrote that too many grandparents all over the world worry about terror and bombings, about wars declared and undeclared, about the kind of world they and their children have made for their
grandchildren.

I said that without major changes in the psyche and behavior of people and nations, innocents and soldiers would continue to die, victims of leaders who order their murder in the name of religion, nationalism or revenge.

I asked how much longer we would accept wars and killings as part of the natural order of things.

I told of my dream of what Princes Harry and William might have said at their mother's funeral.

"Our mother did her best to advance the cause of peace. She embraced the sick and dying. She called for the abolition of tools of war.

"What our Mom did not know was how much the people of the world loved her, how powerful would be your grief at her death. We are sad that she couldn't know how far you might have supported her efforts during her life.

"Today, in our collective grief we ask what can be done in her memory?

"Imagine if you all, the millions of you, refused to let your children go to war. Imagine if a million people surrounded the capitol building of every nation, stood with signs demanding peace, just as you walkedwith flowers for our mother's soul this week? "

Of course, the young princes never spoke my words. Today, 10 years later, my words read, even to me, as anachronisms, a throwback toancient history or utopian novels. They sound like a fairy tale, anidea with never enough takers, a notion that never encompassed much of the world.

Is the situation even worse today than it was 10 years ago? I think so.

And, while it pains me to say it, you and I and the citizens of most western countries are more passive than we were 10 years ago. Still, I believe a majority exists in almost every country for ending the killings, stopping the wars.

If, in most countries, millions of people could be gotten off their tushes and into the streets, peace could break out, and politicians would have to respond.

Don't we owe that to our progeny, if not ourselves?

To come full circle, grandson Michael is now a 20-year-old Israeli army sergeant, with one year of service remaining. Jenny, 18, begins her two-year service this month. No peacetime army service for them. My prayers of 20 years ago remain unfulfilled.

Dov Burt Levy is a regular Jewish Journal Boston North columnist. He may be contacted at
dblevy@columnist.com


Please click this ad to learn more about the Israel Guide Dog Center for the Blind

 

Europe

Albania and the Holocaust: Jewish Survival &   the Ethics of ‘Besa’

By Shirley Cloyes DioGuardi

Very few people know about the long history of Albanian religious tolerance and resistance to oppression. Neither do they know that during World War II, all Jews who lived in Albania or sought asylum in that country were saved from the ravages of the Holocaust.  This information was suppressed by the Stalinist Communist regime of Enver Hoxha who controlled Albania for fifty years.

When European Jewry began fleeing to Albania to escape the unfolding events in Western Europe in the early 1930s, there were approximately 200 Jews living in Albania. (Archaeological evidence documents the presence of Jews in Albanian lands since the epoch of Roman rule.)  At the end of World War II, there were close to 2,000 Jews living in Albania—the only nation that can claim that every Jew within its borders was rescued from the Holocaust. 

One witness to the lack of anti-Semitism in Albania was Herman Bernstein, himself a Jew, who served as U.S. Ambassador to Albania from 1930 to 1933.  Bernstein wrote in his letters that:

"There is no trace of any discrimination against Jews in Albania because Albania happens to be one of the rare lands in Europe today where religious prejudice and hate do not exist, even though Albanians themselves are divided into three faiths….”[1] 

  (Jump to continuation)




To learn more about the Agency for Jewish Education, please click on this ad
 

United States of America

NJDC demands Democrat Moran retract his 'Israel lobby' comment

WASHINGTON, D.C. –  The National Jewish Democratic Council (NJDC) called on Democratic Congressman Jim Moran of Virginia on Friday to retract comments from a recent interview with the publication Tikkun, in which he made the false claim that AIPAC pushed for the Iraq War.  By misrepresenting the organization’s lobbying activities, Moran’s comments could be interpreted as implying that AIPAC was partially responsible for the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2002. 

Rep. Moran’s comments are particularly troubling because they come at a time when Professors Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer are peddling a new book which places substantial blame for the Iraq quagmire on the so-called “Israel Lobby.” 

“It is never easy nor pleasant to criticize a fellow Democrat, but sometimes it is necessary,” said NJDC Executive Director Ira N. Forman.  “While there is nothing wrong with criticizing AIPAC – or for that matter any organization with which you disagree – spreading false statements is clearly irresponsible.   At a time when Professors Walt and Mearsheimer are attempting to defame the so-called Israel Lobby with a phony connection between the pro-Israel community and the Iraq War, Rep. Moran’s comments are not only incorrect and irresponsible – they are downright dangerous.”  

In the September/October 2007 issue of Tikkun, Moran is quoted as having said that “… AIPAC is the most powerful lobby and has pushed this war from the beginning … because they are so well organized, and their members are extraordinarily powerful – most of them are quite wealthy – they have been able to exert power.”   He distinguishes between AIPAC and the Jewish community in general – correctly noting that polls show Jews are more opposed to the Iraq War than any other ethnic group in America.

“For all their bluster, Moran, Walt and Mearsheimer fail to understand a simple truth, continued Forman.  “If AIPAC or the Pro-Israel community were really so powerful, a substantial proportion of Jewish Members of the House and Senate would not have voted against the war.  But they did.”

In 2003, NJDC strongly criticized Rep. Moran for saying: “If it were not for the strong support of the Jewish community for this war with Iraq we would not be doing this” and “The leaders of the Jewish community are influential enough that they could change the direction of where this is going and I think they should.'"

Earlier this week, the New York Jewish Week published Forman’s analysis of the Walt-Mearsheimer book (available online at www.njdc.org), in which he writes: “The authors’ most spectacular accusation — that the lobby has significant responsibility for the Iraq war — is also an illustration of their limited understanding of the Israel lobby. The professors describe how a group of neoconservatives conspired to push for a war with Iraq, and they conflate these neocons with the Israel lobby. Not only do the authors attach a significant amount of blame to the Israel lobby for the morass in Iraq, but they go on to warn that any future military action in Iran must inevitably be laid at the door of the lobby. To argue that a gang of largely Jewish neocons was able to bully Powell, Rumsfeld, Cheney and Bush into a war against their will is absurd. Even more ridiculous is the notion that these neocons were the Israel lobby….”

The preceding story was provided by the National Jewish Democratic Council

(Return to top)



 



Saperstein welcomes court decision narrowing impact of Patriot Act

WASHINGTON, DC (Press Release) - In response to U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero’s ruling striking down the Patriot Act’s provision allowing the FBI to issue national security letters to internet and telephone companies, Rabbi David Saperstein, Director of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, issued the following statement:

Americans have come to accept the realities of living in a post- September 11th world, including the need to create a new balance between security and the protection of civil liberties.  Yesterday’s (Thursday) ruling in New York District Court striking down the FBI’s almost unfettered access to communications records through national security letters (NSLs) is an important step in clarifying that line.  By limiting one of the Patriot Act’s most troubling provisions the court has affirmed a commitment to protecting Americans from unduly invasive practices by the government with little oversight or means of recourse.

The Reform Movement has long been committed to providing law enforcement with the tools that are crucial to combat terrorism, but at the same time, and with the same vigor, we are committed to protecting the freedoms and values that have allowed liberty to thrive in America.   We commend the court’s ruling and will continue to work toward an America where both our security and our rights are protected.

The preceding story was provided by the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism

  
                           (To learn more about these programs, please click on the ads)<